Acasă Articole RTR Valeriu Gherghel, Principiul risipei quodlibetale

Valeriu Gherghel, Principiul risipei quodlibetale

435
Rezumat

The Principe of Quodlibetal Waste

William Ockham’s principle of parsimony was challenged by Walter Chatton’s principle of plenitude. Ockham tended toward simplicity or parsimony in theories and explanations. However, such explanations cannot always be sustained. On the other hand, Walter Chatton wanted more detailed, wasteful explanations. The medieval thinkers, as well as the contemporary ones, are naturally inclined to favor the principle of plenitude. By applying the principle of plenitude, the theological scholars were able to interpret and examine the whole multitude of questions and their possible answers. Out of the extensive quodlibetal repertoire, this essay will examine just four questions.

Keywords: disputatio de quodlibet, principe of simplicity, principe of plenitude, wastefulness, angelology, divine omnipotence.

Bibliografie

a) Surse primare

  • Adso Dervensis, De Ortu et Tempore Antichristi, edited by D. Verhelst, Turnhout: Brepols, 1976.
  • Rabelais, François, “Pantagruel”, in Oeuvres complètes, Paris: Garnier, 1962, ch. VII, pp.250-256.
  •  Rabelais, François, Gargantua şi Pantagruel, traducere de Alexandru Hodoş, Bucureşti: Editura pentru Literatura Universală, 1967.

b) Surse secundare

  • Brower-Toland, Susan, “Can God Know More? A Case Study in Late Medieval Discussions of Propositions”, in Rondo Keele & Charles Bolyard (eds.), Essays in Late Medieval Metaphysics and Semantic Theory, Fordham University Press, 2011.
  • Deely, John, “The Semiosis of Angels”, The Thomist, 68 (2004): 205-258.
  • Ebbesen, Sten, “‘The Present King of France Wears Hypothetical Shoes with Categorical Laces’: Twelfth Century Writers on Well-Formedness”, Medioevo 7 (1981): 91-113.
  • Franklin, James, “Heads of Pins”, Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, 20: 4 (1993): 127.
  • Goris, Harm, “The Angelic Doctor and the Angelic Speech: The Development of Thomas Aquinas’s Thought on How Angels Communicate”, Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 11: 1 (2003): 87-105.
  • Guiley, Rosemary, Encyclopedia of Angels, New York, NY: Facts on File, 1996.
  • Maurer, Armand, “Ockham’s Razor and Chatton’s Anti-Razor”, Mediaeval Studies, 46 (1984): 463-475.
  • Keck, David, Angels & Angelology in the Middle Ages, New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  • Sylla, Edith Dudley, “Swester Katrei and Gregory of Rimini: Angels, God, and Mathematics in the Fourteenth Century”, in Teun K. Koetsier & Luc Bergmans (eds.), Mathematics and the Divine: A Historical Study, Elsevier, 2005, pp.249-271.
DISTRIBUIȚI