Rethinking the Medium: Theoretical Underpinnings
Rezumat
Abstract: This study examines the concept of artistic medium and some of its recent reconceptualizations in philosophical aesthetics, weighing its current relevance in the context of mostly unfavorable positions in contemporary art, generally characterized as post-medium. In the three sections of the paper, I identify the essential terms and distinctions required to redefining the medium. In this regard, I invoke Stanley Cavell, Rosalind Krauss, and Sherri Irvin, who theorize automatisms, conventions, rules and practices as symbolic supports; and Dominic Lopes and Elisa Caldarola, who put forth and develop the notion of medium profile, respectively. Revolving around the theory of the medium advanced by Rosalind Krauss, my analysis shows the ways in which Krauss, building on the theoretical terms that underpin Stanley Cavell’s conception of the ontology of film, anticipated or influenced some of the current definitions of the medium. Namely, the correlated notions of automatisms, conventions, rules and practices by virtue of which Krauss conceptualizes the medium undergird Sherri Irvin’s thesis positing rules for presentation, conservation and participation as symbolic resources with expressive force that form part of the medial structure of contemporary artworks.
Keywords: artistic medium, technical/symbolic support, automatism, conventions, rules, practices.
Bibliografie
Acknowledgement: This paper is the result of a research residency at the Istituto Romeno di Cultura e Ricerca Umanistica in Venice, obtained with the support of the Romanian state through the national scholarship program “Nicolae Iorga” (2022), and is part of the PhD thesis titled The Contemporary Art Exhibition as Artistic Medium (2023), written by Georgiana Buț at “Babeș-Bolyai” University in Cluj-Napoca, Doctoral School of Philosophy, under the supervision of Professor Dan Eugen Rațiu.
Bibliography
Binkley, Timothy. “Piece: Contra Aesthetics.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35, no. 3, (Spring 1977): 265-277. https://doi.org/10.2307/430287.
Buskirk, Martha. The Contingent Object of Contemporary Art. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005.
Caldarola, Elisa. Filosofia dell’arte contemporanea: installazioni, siti, oggetti. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2020.
Caroll, Noël. “The Specificity of Media in the Arts.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 19, no. 4 (Winter, 1985): 5-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332295.
Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say? A book of Essays. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
Cavell, Stanley. The World Viewed. Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Cambridge MA & London: Harvard University Press, 1979.
Costello, Diarmuid. “Automat, Automatic, Automatism: Rosalind Krauss and Stanley Cavell on Photography and the Photographically Dependent Arts.” Critical Inquiry 38, no. 4 (2012): 819-54. https://doi.org/10.1086/667426.
Davies, David. “Medium.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by Jerrold Levinson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Fizell, Megan. “Eating Robert Gober’s Bag of Donuts.” art21 magazine (2014). https://magazine.art21.org/2014/01/21/eating-robert-gobers-bag-of-donuts/#.Y1-ztnbMJPY.
Gaut, Berys. A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Irvin, Sherri. Immaterial. Rules in Contemporary Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Krauss, Rosalind. Under Blue Cup. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 2011.
Krauss, Rosalind. “Reinventing the Medium.” Critical Inquiry 25, no. 2 (1999): 289-305.
Krauss, Rosalind. “‘The Rock’: William Kentridge’s Drawings for Projection.” October 92 (2000): 3-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/779231.
Lopes, Dominic McIver. Beyond Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Margolis, Joseph. Art and Philosophy. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1980.
Rațiu, Dan Eugen. Disputa modernism-postmodernism. O introducere în teoriile contemporane asupra artei [The modernism-postmodernism dispute. An introduction to contemporary theories of art]. Cluj-Napoca, Eikon, 2012.
Walton, Kendall L. “Categories of Art.” The Philosophical Review 79, no. 3 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2307/2183933.
Wollheim, Richard. Art and its Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
