Raluca Mureșan, Despre delictul de opinie
Rezumat
About „crime of opinion”
Although the expression crime of opinion is used quite often, if someone is put in the position to explain it, it will be rather difficult for him/her to do that, because the concept is rarely defined. Even if we don’t have a clear definition of this concept, we used it in the common language related with the idea of a restriction of the freedom of expression. Is it the crime of opinion illegal according to our criminal law or is it just an argument in a dispute about media ethics?
Keywords: crime of opinion, freedom of expression, objectivity, sanction, facts vs. Opinion
Bibliografie
- Cercelescu, Carmen, Monica, Regimul juridic al presei. Drepturile şi obligaţiile jurnaliştilor / The Legal Regime of the Press. Rights and Obligations of the Journalists, Ed. Teora, Bucureşti, 2002.
- Macovei, M., Drăgăliţă, A., Mihai, D., Ghid juridic pentru ziarişti / Jegal Guide for the Journalists, ed. a III-a, Active Watch – Agenţia de Monitorizare a Presei, Bucureşti, 2009.
- Popa, Dumitru, Titus, Dreptul comunicării / Communication Law, Ed. Norma, Bucureşti, 1999.
- Popa, Dumitru, Titus, Delictele de presă (Cele 55 de argumente pro causa) / Press Crimes (The 55 Pro Causa Arguments), Ed. Norma, Bucureşti, 2004.
- Raportul FreEx, Libertatea presei în România 2012 / The FreEx Report, Press Freedom in Romania 2012; Raportul FreEx, Libertatea presei în România 2013 / The FreEx Report, Press Freedom in Romania 2013, available at http://www.activewatch.ro/ro/freeex/publicatii/, accessed on 02.10.2014.
