Procreația modernă și implicațiile juridice: de la bioetică la biodrept
Rezumat
Modern Procreation and Legal Implications: From Bioethics to Biolaw
Abstract: The evolution of medical technology in the field of medically assisted human reproduction should, like all innovation and progress, be viewed with great admiration. In the times we are living in, today’s biotechnologies have become for all infertile couples the only hope of fulfilling their dream of becoming parents. However, global dilemmas about the ethical, legal, social and religious implications of medically assisted human procreation are growing in the absence of specific regulations that combine moral and legal principles. In the present study, we aim to outline some of the key issues in this area with regard to the right to know one’s biological identity, anonymous birth and post-mortem procreation. In the current Romanian legal system, there is no special legislation regulating all the situations that may arise as a result of recourse to medical procreation techniques. Biolaw should become the link between scientific research and society’s legal values.
Keywords: bioethics, right to privacy, children’s rights, surrogacy, donor, RUAM, surrogate motherhood, filiation.
Bibliografie
Bakiu, Arta Selami, and Adnan Jashari. “Establishing a Family by the New Technologies for Artificial Reproduction according to the Positive Legislation of North Macedonia in the Light of Comparative Family Law.” Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, no. 10 (2021): 57–70.
Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Bindea, Victoria. “Oscilând între frumos și hidos, Dumnezeu ne judecă” [Oscillating between beautiful and hideous, God judges us]. Bioethica, no. 2 (2009): 67–75.
Cercel, Sevastian, and Oana Ghiță. “Interesul superior al copilului” [The best interests of the child]. Romanian Review of Private Law, no. 3 (2018): 130–148.
Dobozi, Veronica. “Reproducerea umană asistată medical în viziunea Noului Cod civil” [Medically Assisted Human Reproduction in the Vision of the New Civil Code]. Curierul Judiciar, no. 10 (2011): 532–541.
Florian, Emese. “Filiația: între obsesia adevărului biologic și mistificare legală” [Parentage: between obsession with biological truth and legal mystification]. Romanian Review of Private Law, no. 3 (2018): 117–129.
Irinescu, Lucia. “Accesul la reproducerea umană asistată medical. Modelul Italiei” [Access to medically assisted human reproduction: The Italian Model]. Family Law Magazine, no. 1 (2020): 110–128.
Irinescu, Lucia. “Copilul, un drept sau un dar” [The child, a right or a gift]. Family Law Journal, no. 1-2 (2019): 208–218.
Jashari, Adnan. “Establishing a Family by the New Technologies for Artificial Reproduction according to the Positive Legislation of North Macedonia in
the Light of Comparative Family Law.” Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Special Issue (October 2021): 57–70.
Jugastru, Călina. “Câteva noțiuni de bioetică în dreptul român” [Some notions of bioethics in Romanian law]. Acta Universitatis Lucian Blaga, no. 2 (2010): 57–70.
Jugastru, Călina. “Reproducerea medical asistată în dreptul internațional privat – ipoteza maternității de substituție” [Medically assisted reproduction in private international law – the surrogacy hypothesis]. Dreptul, nr. 10 (2016): 95–127.
Jugastru, Călina, “Rezonanțe ale jurisprudenței europene în dreptul internațional privat român” [Resonances of European jurisprudence in Romanian private international law]. In The Topicality and Prospects of the Interdependence of European Union Law and the National Law of the Member States, edited by Predescu, Ovidiu, Augustin Fuerea and Andrei Duțu-Buzura, 114–130. Bucharest: Universul Juridic, 2002.
Neamț, Ioan Ilieș. “Reproducerea umană asistată medical: adevăr sau provocare?” [Medically assisted human reproduction: truth or challenge?]. In A family for Europe: A Europe of families?, edited by Popescu, Dan Andrei, and Sergiu Golub, 630–681. Bucharest: Hamangiu, 2022.
Nicolae, Ioana and Georgeta-Bianca Spârchez. “Acțiuni privind filiația față de mamă în ipoteza maternității de subrogație” [Actions relating to parentage in the hypothesis of surrogate motherhood]. Family Law Magazine, no. 1-2 (2019): 427–440.
Nicolescu, Cristina. “Cu viața pre moarte călcând. Procreația post-mortem și implicațiile sale de natură etică, socială și juridică” [With life before death treading. Post-mortem procreation and its ethical, social and legal implications]. In A family for Europe. A Europe of families?, edited by Popescu, Dan Andrei, and Sergiu Golub, 710–727. Bucharest: Hamangiu, 2022.
Nicolescu, Cristina. Dreptul familiei [Family Law]. Bucharest: Solomon, 2023.
Nicolescu, Cristina. “Modele familiale non-tradiționale în arhitectura Codului civil român” [Non-traditional family models in the architecture of the Romanian Civil Code]. Romanian Review of Private Law, no. 3-4 (2021): 275–297.
Niţă, Marian, Iuliana Gheorghe, Florin Ionescu, Otilia Bogdan, Cristian Mogoi, and Violeta Buşe. Dicţionar de bioetică. Craiova: AIUS PrintEd, 2009.
Pessina, Adriano, and Mario Picozzi. Percorsi di bioetica. Milano: Vita e Pensiero, 2002.
Predescu, Nicoleta-Ramona. “Soluții legislative și practici judiciare în materia reproducerii asistate medical cu mamă surogat” [Legislative solutions and judicial practices in the field of medically assisted reproduction with surrogate mother]. Curierul Judiciar, no. 8 (2020): 476–481.
Şestun, Evgheni. Familia ortodoxă [Orthodox family]. Bucureşti: Sophia, 2005.
Tec, Lavinia. “Hotărârile CEDO în cauzele Foulon c/ Franța și Bouvet c/ Franța: accesul bărbaților celibatari și a cuplurilor gay la gestația pentru altul și filiația copilului. Încă un pas spre familia neconvențională” [ECHR judgments in Foulon v France and Bouvet v France: access of single men and gay couples to surrogacy and parentage. Another step towards the unconventional family]. https://www.juridice.ro/466481/hotararile-cedo-in-cauzele-foulon-c-franta-si-bouvet-c-franta-accesul-barbatilor-celibatari-si-a-cuplurilor-gay-la-gestatia-pentru-altul-si-filiatia-copilului-inca-un-pas-spre-familianeconvention.html.
Tec, Lavinia. “Gestația pentru altul, din nou, sub lupa Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului” [Pregnancy for another, again under the spotlight of the European Court of Human Rights]. https://www.juridice.ro/635823/gestatia-pentru-altul-din-nou-sub-lupa-curtii-europene-a-drepturilor-omului.html.
Tec, Lavinia. “Soarta embrionilor umani congelați – o nouă provocare în drept” [The fate of frozen human embryos – a new challenge in law]. Romanian Review of Private Law, no. 4 (2017): 234–250.
Tec, Lavinia. “Tensiuni între interesul superior și unele drepturi ale copilului” [Tensions between best interests and some children’s rights]. Family Law Magazine, Special Issue (2020): 320–325.
Whitehouse, Peter J. “The Rebirth of Bioethics: A Tribute to Van Rensselaer Potter.” Global Bioethics, no. 4 (2001): 37–45.
