Acasă Articole RTR Metamodernismul în teorie și în practică: pentru o conceptualizare a modernității singulare...
Metamodernismul în teorie și în practică: pentru o conceptualizare a modernității singulare în câmpul literar românesc
Rezumat
Metamodernism in Theory and Praxis: Towards a Conceptualization of Singular Modenity in the Romanian Literary Field
Abstract: Metamodernism is a Eurocentric theoretical fiction, with no adherence to the social and cultural realities of post-communist Romania. This article provides a critique of the theory of metamodernism proposed by Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van den Akker and used by Alex Ciorogar to describe the post-2010 Romanian poetry system. Even if the concept is inoperative for Romanian literature, it is a symptom of the overcoming of the postmodernist framework, felt by writers as anti-essentialist, light-hearted, and unconcerned with the problems of today’s society (climate crisis, immigrants, marginalized communities, economic inequalities between classes, etc.). What I notice in the footsteps of Jeffrey Nealon & Galin Tihanov is that the focus shifts from an autonomist “regime of relevance” to one that is socially, politically, and identity-building oriented. My analysis will propose a number of criticisms of the internal contradictions generated by the two Dutchmen’s theory: firstly, that the “Yo-yo effect” of metamodernism – a metaphor I coined to better understand the basic concept – does not fully explain the cultural landscape of the Romanian literary system. In addition, it is built on a sum of generalizations of modernism and postmodernism, which have not been unanimously accepted by the theorists. A second criticism of Vermeulen and van den Akker’s study is its Western-centric stance, which ignores the (semi-)peripheral specificity of cultures. If we absurdly accept the existence of metamodernism, it is only a combination of ideologies and styles of historical currents subsumable to modernity. Therefore, I will propose, following in the footsteps of Fredric Jameson and the Warwick Research Collective, the concept of singular modernity, and I argue why there cannot yet be a postmodernity in Eastern Europe. Discussing post-communist Romanian literature in terms of unfinished, combined, and unevenly developed modernity is much more productive because it takes into account both the material-social conditions of Romania and the cultural-artistic acquisitions thanks to the transfer of symbolic capital between central and (semi)peripheral systems.
Keywords: metamodernism, Romanian literature, post-postmodernism, postmodernism, cultural paradigm, aesthetic synthesis, literary theory, singular modernity.
Bibliografie
Andrei, Răzvan. Raport către Walt Whitman. Poeme LGBT [Reporting to Walt Whitman. LGBT Poems]. Alba Iulia: OMG Publishing, 2022.
Baghiu, Ștefan. “The Relative Autonomy of Literature: Romanian Literary Criticism and Theory before World War II”. Transilvania, no. 5 (2020): 29-38.
Bâlici, Mihnea. “Fracturismul în câmpul literar românesc” [”Fracturism in the Romanian Literary Field”]. Transilvania, no. 5 (2021): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2021.05.01.
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence. A Theory of Poetry. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Bourriaud, Nicolas, (ed.). Altermodern. Tate Triennal 2009. London: Tate Publishing, 2009.
Călinescu, Matei. Cinci fețe ale modernității: modernism, avangardă, decadență, kitsch, postmodernism [Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism], second edition. Iași: Polirom, 2005.
Călinescu, Matei. Conceptul modern de poezie: de la romantism la avangardă [The modern concept of poetry: from romanticism to the avant-garde]. București: Humanitas, 2017.
Cărtărescu, Mircea. Poezia [Poetry]. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2015.
Cărtărescu, Mircea. Postmodernismul românesc [Romanian Postmodernism]. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2010.
Chiorean, Maria. “Regimes of Relevance: The Newcomers”. Transilvania, no. 5 (2020): 20-28.
Ciotloș, Cosmin. Cenaclul de luni: viața și opera [The Monday Cenacle: life and work]. București: Pandora M, 2021.
Dumitru, Teodora. “Gaming the World-System: Creativity, Politics, and Beat Influence in the Poetry of the 1980s Generation.” In Romanian Literature as World Literature, edited by Mircea Martin, Christian Moraru, Andrei Terian, 271-288. Bloomsbury Academic: New York, 2018.
Farmatu, Teona. “Network Temporalities and North American Influence in the Romanian Poetry of the Early 1980s.” Transilvania, no. 3 (2022): 48-56.
Gârdan, Daiana. “REVIEW: Metamodernism. Historicity, Affect and Depth after Postmodernism”. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory, no. 4 (2018): 200-205.
Giannouras, Haris. “Post-Soviet: Otherness and the Aesthetic of Disappearance.” Swarm: https://swarmmag.com/words/post-soviet-otherness-and-the-aesthetic-of-disappearance/
Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, no. 3 (1988): 575-599.
Harding, Sandra. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. New York: Cornell University Press, 1991.
Hayles, N. Katherine. “Influences of the Digital.” In Postmodern/Postwar And After, edited by Jason Gladstone, Andrew Hoberek, Daniel Worden, 209-215. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 2016.
Iovănel, Mihai. Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcommunism]. Bucharest: Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române, 2016.
Iovănel, Mihai. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020]. Iași: Polirom, 2021.
Jameson, Fredric. “Postmodernism and Consumer Society.” In The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture.Washington: Bay Press, 1983.
Jameson, Fredric. A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present. London & New York: Verso, 2012.
Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernismul sau logica culturală a capitalismului târziu [Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]. Translated by Alex Văsieș and Vlad Pojoga. Sibiu: Lucian Blaga University Press, 2021.
Kirby, Alan. Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure our Culture. New York/London: Continuum, 2009.
Leac, V. (coord.). Perturbări în desfășurare. O antologie a prezentului [Ongoing Disturbances. An Anthology of the Present]. Bucharest: frACTalia, 2021.
Levey, Nick. Maximalism in Contemporary American Literature. The Use of Detail. New York & London: Routledge, 2017.
Lipovetsky, Gilles. Hypermodern Times. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.
Martin, Mircea. “Un postmodernism fără postmodernitate” [”Postmodernism without postmodernity”]. România literară, no. 40 (1996): 12-13.
Mironescu, Doris. “Regimuri de relevanță, puncte de rezistență: literatura română în postcomunism” [”Regimes of relevance, points of resistance: Romanian literature in post-communism”]. Transilvania, no. 7-8 (2021): 107-114.
Nealon, Jeffrey T. Post-postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of just-in-time capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.
Olaru, Ovio. „«Postdouămiismul». O promoție”. Transilvania, no 7 (2017): 46-56.
Perloff, Marjorie. The Futurist Moment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
Petrescu, Ioana Em. Eminescu și mutațiile poeziei românești [Eminescu and Changes in Romanian Poetry]. Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 1989.
Pop, Doru. “Înainte de postumanism, ar trebui să descoperim umanismul” [”Before posthumanism, we should discover humanism”], în Alex Ciorogar (coord.), Postumanismul (București: Tracus Arte, 2019), 60-66.
Popescu, Simona. Răspuns la ancheta Influențe și confluențe în literatura română contemporană [In response to the thematic issue on The Sociology of the Romanian Novel]. Vatra no. 10-11 (2022): 71-74.
Reynolds, Simon. Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past. New York: Faber and Faber, 2011.
Roudometof, Victor. Glocalization: A Critical Introduction. London & New York: Routledge, 2016.
Rowland, Antony. Metamodernism and Contemporary British Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Samuels, R. “Auto-Modernity after Postmodernism: Autonomy and Automation in Culture, Technology, and Education.” In Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected, edited by T. Mcpherson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.
Schiop, Adrian. Răspuns la ancheta dosarului Sociologia romanului românesc [In response to the thematic issue on The Sociology of the Romanian Novel]. Vatra, no. 5-6 (2021): 40-42.
Terian, Andrei. “Sindromul «Frederic» sau Jameson în România” [The “Frederic” Syndrome or Jameson in Romania]. In Frederic Jameson, Postmodernismul sau logica culturală a capitalismului târziu, i-x. Sibiu: Lucian Blaga University Press, 2021.
Tihanov, Galin. The Birth and Death of Literary Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019.
van den Akker, Robin, Alison Gibbons, Timotheus Vermeulen. Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. London & New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.
Vancu, Radu. “Poetica lui Mircea Cărtărescu. O tipologie” [Mircea Cărtărescu’s Poetics. A Typology]. Transilvania, no. 6 (2016): 13-21.
Vermeulen, Timotheus, and Robin van den Akker. “Notes on metamodernism.” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 2 (2010): 1-14.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. Pentru a înțelege lumea. O introducere în analiza sistemelor-lume [For an Understanding of the World. An Introduction to World-Systems Analysis]. Translation and terminological notes by Ovidiu Țichindeleanu. Cluj-Napoca: Idea Design & Print, 2013.
Warwick Research Collective. Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World-Literature.Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2015.
Williams, David. Writing Postcommunism. Towards a Literature of the East European. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Yousef, Tawfiq. “Modernism, Postmodernism, and Metamodernism: A Critique.” International Journal of Language and Literature, no. 1 (2017): 33-43.
Žižek, Slavoj. How to Read Lacan. New York & London: W. W Norton & Company, 2006.
