Eugen Huzum, Ce este egalitarianismul ?
Rezumat
What Is Egalitarianism?
In its most part, this article is a critique of three of the most common ways of defining egalitarianism: 1) egalitarianism is a trend of thought in political philosophy to which belong (all) philosophers who support a form of equality, whatever it may be, between all members of a community; 2) egalitarianism is a trend of thought in political philosophy which has as a ultimate or foundational value equality in the abstract sense of treating all people as equals; and 3) egalitarianism is a trend of thought in political philosophy that defends equality in the distribution of certain goods or resources. In the last part of the article I defend the idea that egalitarianism is much better described as a trend of thought in political philosophy that defends a substantial equality between all members of a community as a ultimate principle of social justice.
Keywords: distributive egalitarianism, formal equality, pure egalitarianism, relational egalitarianism, social justice, substantial equality
Bibliografie
- Anderson, Elizabeth. „What is the Point of Equality?” În Ethics 109, 2, 1999, p. 287-337.
- Arneson, Richard J. „Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare”. În Philosophical Studies, 56, 1, 1989, p. 77-93.
- Arneson, Richard J. „Postscript”. În Equality: Selected Readings, ed. Louis P. Pojman şi Robert Westmoreland, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 228-241.
- Arneson, Richard J. „Egalitarianism”. În Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Stanford, Stanford University, 2002, articol disponibil la adresa web http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/, accesat la 2 septembrie 2011.
- Arneson, Richard J. „Justice Is Not Equality”. În Justice, Equality, and Constructivism, ed. Brian Feltham, Ratio, 21, 4, 2008, p. 371-391.
- Arneson, Richard J. „Luck Egalitarianism Interpreted and Defended,” articol disponibil la adresa web http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/rarneson/luckegalitarianism2.pdf, accesat la 6 septembrie 2011 .
- G. A. „On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”. În Ethics 99, 4, 1989, p. 906-944.
- Cohen, G. A. Rescuing Justice and Equality, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2008, 430 p.
- Cohen, G. A. Why Not Socialism?, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2009, 92 p.
- Cohen, G. A. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, ed. Michael Otsuka, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2011, 288 p.
- Cohen, Joshua; Rogers, Joel (ed.). Is Inequality Bad for our Health?, Boston, Beacon Press, 2000, 112 p.
- Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1978, 371 p.
- Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985, 448 p.
- Dworkin, Ronald. Drepturile la modul serios, Chişinău, ARC, 1998, 339 p.
- Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2000, 511 p.
- Fraser, Nancy. „Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, Participation”. În Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, Nancy Fraser, Axel Honneth, London & New York, Verso, 2003, p. 7-197.
- Fraser, Nancy. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World, New York, Columbia University Press, 2009, 224 p.
- Holtug, Nils; Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. „An Introduction to Contemporary Egalitarianism”. În Egalitarianism. New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality, ed. Nils Holtug şi Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2007, p. 1-37.
- Kekes, John. The Illusions of Egalitarianism, Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press, 2003, 228 p.
- Knight, Carl. Luck Egalitarianism: Equality, Responsibility, and Justice, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2009, 250 p.
- Kymlicka, Will. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Second Edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, 512 p.
- Miller, David. „Equality and Justice”. În Ratio, 10, 3, 1997, p. 222-236.
- Miller, David. „What Kind of Equality Should the Left Pursue?” În Equality, ed. Jane Franklin, London: IPPR, 1997, p. 83-99.
- Pogge, Thomas W. Realizing Rawls, Ithaca, Cornell University, Press, 1989, 296 p.
- Pojman, Louis. „Are All Humans Equal?: A Critique of Contemporary Egalitarianism”. În Equality: Selected Readings, ed. Louis P. Pojman şi Robert Westmoreland, New York, Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 282–299.
- Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, Cambridge, Belknap Press, 1999, 538 p.
- Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, Belknap Press, 2001, 214 p.
- Rothbard, Murray N. Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays, Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2000, 321 p.
- Scheffler, Samuel. „What Is Egalitarianism?” În Philosophy & Public Affairs 31, 1, 2003, p. 5-39.
- Segall, Shlomi. „In Solidarity with the Imprudent: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism”. În Social Theory and Practice 33, 2, 2007, p. 177-198.
- Sen, Amartya. Inequality Re-examined. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992, 224 p.
- Tan, Kok-Chor. Justice Without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 234 p.
- Tan, Kok-Chor. „A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism”. În The Journal of Philosophy CV, 11, 2008, p. 669-670.
- Temkin, Larry S. „Illuminating Egalitarianism”. În Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, ed. Thomas Cristiano şi John Christman, Malden, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, p. 155-178.
- Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York, Basic Books, 1983, 345 p.
- Wilkinson, Richard G. Unhealthy Societies. The Afflictions of Inequality, London, Routledge, 1996, 272 p.
- Woodard, Christopher. „Egalitarianism”. În Philosophical Books 46, 2, 2005, p. 97- 112.
- Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1991, 294 p.
