Dumitru Tucan, A înţelege şi a interpreta (I)
Understanding and interpretation (I)
This two-part study aims to analyze the complex linguistic, pragmatic and cultural mechanisms involved in the act of text (discourse) understanding. The fundamental questions concerning this issue are as follows: How do we understand texts and what specific competences are involved in understanding? What exactly causes differences in understanding? And then, what are the causes of misunderstanding? Why, despite differences in understanding, can we find dominant ways of understanding texts? In short, what is understanding? Is there a relation between understanding and interpretation? And finally, what is interpretation?
The first part of the study starts from the analysis of an ordinary type of discourse (the transcript of a video), and here we identify and discuss three types of competences involved in the process of understanding: the linguistic competence, the interdiscursive competence, and the cultural competence. The interactive dynamics of these three competences generates valid and functional meanings in a specific context. Meaning does not represent the objective or ultimate truth, but it is a good functioning of the discourse in the given context. Therefore, accidents of understanding are unavoidable, and they can be caused by the malfunctioning of one of the three competences involved.
Keywords: understanding process, interpretation, linguistic competence, interdiscursive competence, cultural competence, frames, cognitive linguistics.
- Armengaud 1982: Françoise Armengaud, „Eléments pour une approche pragmatique de la pertinence” în Philosophica, Gand, nr. 29, 1982;
- Barsalou 1992: Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Scientists, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992;
- Chomski, 1965: Noam Chomsky, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1965.
- Cornea 1998: Paul Cornea, Introducere în teoria lecturii, Iaşi, Polirom, 1998.
- Cornea 2006: Paul Cornea, Interpretare şi raţionalitate, Iaşi, Polirom, 2006.
- Ducrot, Schaeffer, 1996: Oswald Ducrot, Jean Marie Schaeffer, Noul dicţionar enciclopedic al ştiinţelor limbajului, Babel, 1996.
- Eco 1997: Umberto Eco, Şase plimbări prin pădurea narativă, Constanţa, Pontica, 1997;
- Fillmore 1985: C. J. Fillmore, “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding”, Quaderni di Semantica, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 222-254, December 1985.
- Foucault 1999: Michel Foucault, Arheologia cunoaşterii, Bucureşti, Univers, 1999;
- Grice 1957: H. P. Grice, „Meaning”, în The Philosophical Review, Vol. 66, No. 3 (Jul., 1957), 377-388;
- Grice 1979: Paul Grice, Logique et conversation, „Communications”, nr. 30 (juin 1979) Seuil, Paris, , p. 57-72.
- Kerbrat – Orecchioni 1990: Catherine Kerbrat – Orecchioni, Les intéractions verbales, vol. I, Paris, Armand Colin, 1990.
- Kovecses 2006: Zoltán Kövecses, Language, Mind, and Culture, Oxford University Presss, 2006;
- Lakoff 1987: George Lakoff, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1987;
- Maingueneau, 1984: Dominique Maingueneau, Genèses du discourse, Liege, Pierre Mardaga, 1984 ;
- Mîrţu 2008: Mihaela Mîrţu, Studiu introductiv la Dominique Maingueneau, Lingvistică pentru textul literar, Iaşi, Institutul european, 2008;
- Rastier 1996: Fr. Rastier, (1ère éd. 1987) Sémantique interprétative, Paris, PUF.
- Rastier 1998: Fr. Rastier, Le problème épistémologique du contexte et le problème de l’interprétation dans les sciences du langage, în „Langages”, 129, pp. 97-111.
- Taylor 1989: John Taylor, Linguistic Categorization, Oxford: Claredon Press, 1989;
- Wittgenstein 2004: Ludwig Wittgenstein, Cercetări filosofice, Bucureşti, Humanitas, 2004.
