Acasă Articole RTR Agency, Machine-thinking, and Fetishism: A Critique of Machinic Theories of Subjectivity
Agency, Machine-thinking, and Fetishism: A Critique of Machinic Theories of Subjectivity
Rezumat
Abstract: This paper critiques two dominant perspectives on agency within digital capitalism. Proponents of the cognitive capitalism thesis claim that cognitive labourers develop a novel, autonomous subjectivity that escapes capitalist control, potentially enabling a post-capitalist transformation. In contrast, Steinhoff (2021), drawing on Ramtin (1991), argues that the application of AI and digital machinery erodes intellectual labour and reinforces capital’s dominance, giving rise to capital as a “non-metaphorically autonomous” agent. I argue that both perspectives mirror each other: the alleged autonomy of labour in cognitive capitalism finds its counterpart in the autonomy of capital in Steinhoff’s account. Building on Evald Ilyenkov’s critique of cybernetics and his conception of thinking as socially and bodily constituted, I show that both views rely on a fetishistic and individualistic conception of agency. From Ilyenkov’s standpoint, agency is irreducibly social, emerging from historically specific forms of labour and collective activity—an aspect absent in both accounts.
Keywords: Human Agency, Cognitive Capitalism, Artificial Intelligence, Evald Ilyenkov, Social Constitution of Thought, Fetishism, Digital Labour.
Bibliografie
Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the project “Philosophy in Late Socialist Europe: Theoretical Practices in the Face of Polycrisis” funded by European Union—Nextgeneration EU and Romanian Government, under National Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania, contract no. 760044//23.05.2023, cod PNRR-C9-I8-CF104/15.11.2022, through the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, within Component 9, Investment I8.
Bibliography
Allmer, Thomas. 2018. “Theorising and Analysing Academic Labour.” TripleC 16, no. 1: 49–71. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i1.868.
Azeri, Siyaves. 2024. “On the Nature of Thought: Centennial of Evald Ilyenkov.” Marxism & Sciences 3, no. 1: iii–xxiv.
Fuchs, Christian. 2016. “Dallas Smythe Today – The Audience Commodity, the Digital Labour Debate, Marxist Political Economy and Critical Theory. Prolegomena to a Digital Labour Theory of Value.” In Marx and the Political Economy of the Media, edited by Christian Fuchs and Vincent Mosco, 522–599. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Hall, Richard, and Bernd Stahl. 2016. “Against Commodification: The University, Cognitive Capitalism and Emergent Technologies.” In Marx and the Political Economy of the Media, edited by Christian Fuchs and Vincent Mosco, 65–97. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.
Ilyenkov, Evald. 1968. Ob idolakh i idealakh [On Idols and Ideals]. Retrieved from http://caute.ru/ilyenkov/texts/iddl/index.html.
Ilyenkov, Evald. 1971. “Humanism and Science.” Marxist Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/articles/humanism-science.htm.
Ilyenkov, Evald. 2009. Dialectical Logic. In The Ideal in Human Activity (Marxists Internet Archive), 1–214.
Ilyenkov, Evald. 2012. “Dialectics of the Ideal (2009).” Historical Materialism 20, no. 2: 149–193. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341248.
Ilyenkov, Evald, Anatoliy Arsen’ev, and Vasily Davydov. 2024. “Machine and Human, Cybernetics and Philosophy.” Marxism & Sciences 3, no. 2: 155–174. Translated by Iurii Maksymets. https://doi.org/10.56063/MS.2408.03209.
Kicillof, Axel, and Guido Starosta. 2007. “On Materiality and Social Form: A Political Critique of Rubin’s Value-Form Theory.” Historical Materialism 15, no. 3: 9–43.
Marx, Karl. 1992. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London and New York: Penguin Books and New Left Review.
Marx, Karl. 1993. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Translated by Martin Nicolaus. London: Penguin Books.
Murray, Patrick. 2004. “The Social and Material Transformation of Production by Capital: Formal and Real Subsumption in Capital, Volume I.” In The Constitution of Capital: Essays on Volume I of Marx’s Capital, edited by Riccardo Bellofiore and Nicola Taylor, 243–273. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Pitts, Harry. 2016. “A Crisis of Measurability? Critiquing Post-Operaismo on Labour, Value and the Basic Income.” Capital & Class 40, no. 1: 1–19.
Ramtin, Ramin. 1991. Capitalism and Automation: Revolution in Technology and Capitalist Breakdown. London: Pluto Press.
Starosta, Guido. 2012. “Cognitive Commodities and the Value-Form.” Science & Society 76, no. 3: 365–392.
Steinhoff, James. 2021. Automation and Autonomy: Labour, Capital and Machines in the Artificial Intelligence Industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Szadkowski, Krystian. 2016. “Towards an Orthodox Marxian Reading of Subsumption(s) of Academic Labour Under Capital.” Workplace 28: 9–29. https://doi.org/10.14288/workplace.v0i28.186210.
Terranova, Tiziana. 2000. “Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy.” Social Text 18, no. 2: 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33.
Vercellone, Carlo. 2007. “From Formal Subsumption to General Intellect: Elements for a Marxist Reading of the Thesis of Cognitive Capitalism.” Historical Materialism 15, no. 1: 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920607X171681.
Vercellone, Carlo. 2014. “From the Mass-Worker to Cognitive Labour: Historical and Theoretical Considerations.” In Beyond Marx, edited by Marcel van der Linden and Karl Heinz Roth, 417–443. Leiden: Brill.
Virno, Paolo. 2002. “General Intellect, Exodus, Multitude: Interview with Paolo Virno.” Archipélago 54.
Woodcock, Jamie. 2018. “Digital Labour in the University: Understanding the Transformations of Academic Work in the UK.” TripleC 16, no. 1: 129–142.
