Acasă Articole RTR Theory/Literature/Culture. The Legacy of Literary Theory in the “Post-Theoretical” Age

Theory/Literature/Culture. The Legacy of Literary Theory in the “Post-Theoretical” Age

87
Rezumat

Theory/Literature/Culture. The Legacy of Literary Theory in the “Post-Theoretical” Age*

In After Theory, Terry Eagleton claimed that literary and cultural studies are now in their post-theoretical age. Since then, more and more voices have echoed his statement. As Jonathan Culler put it as early as 2000 (The Literary in Theory), we are very much aware of the end of our faith in “high theory.” However, this proves not only that theory isn’t dead yet, but also that theory, be it literary or cultural, lives on implicitly or rather explicitly in the analytical, critical or hermeneutical approaches that are nowadays at the core of the discourse on literature and culture. Starting from these assumptions, this paper seeks to portray what we see today as the legacy of the theoretical discourse on literature and culture in the 20th century.

Keywords: literary theory, post-theory, poetics, literary studies

Bibliografie

Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Image-Music-Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977. 142-48. Print.

Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang, 1998.

Compagnon, Antoine. Le démon de la théorie : Littérature et sens commun / Literature, Theory, and Common Sense. Paris: Seuil, 1998. Print.

Culler, Jonathan. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. London: Routledge, 1983. Print.

Culler, Jonathan. The Literary in Theory. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2007. Print.

Culler, Jonathan. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975. Print.

De Man, Paul. The Resistance to Theory. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1986. Print.

Eagleton, Terry. After Theory. New York: Basic Books, 2003. Print.

Eikhenbaum, Boris Mihailovich. “The Theory of the ‘Formal Method’”. Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Eds. and trans. Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1965. 99-140. Print.

Knapp, Steven, Michaels, Walter Benn. ”Against Theory”. Critical Inquiry (1982), 8 (4): 723-742. Print.

Morin, Edgar. La Méthode 4. Les Idées, leur habitat, leur vie, leurs mœurs, leur organisation / The Method 4. The Ideas, Their Habitat, Their Life, Their Habits, Their Organization. Paris: Seuil, 1991. Print.

Olsen, Stein Haugrom. The End of Literary Theory. Cambridge UP, 1987. Print.

Pavel, Thomas. Le mirage linguistique /The Spell of Language. Paris: Editions du Minuit, 1988. Print.

Richardson, Alan, and Francis F. Steen. “Literature and the Cognitive Revolution: An Introduction.” Poetics Today 23.1 (2002): 1-8.

Schaeffer, J.M. Petite écologie des études littéraires: Pourquoi et comment étudier la littérature / A Short Handbook on the Ecology of Literary Studies: Why Study Literature and How to Do It. Ed. Thierry Marchaisse, 2011. Print.

Scholes, Robert, Structuralism in Literature: An Introduction. New Haven: Yale UP, 1974. Print.

Tihanov, Galin. ”Why Did Modern Literary Theory Originate in Central and Eastern Europe? (And Why Is It Now Dead?)”. Common Knowledge (Winter 2004) 10(1): 61-81. Print.

Todorov, Tzvetan, La Littérature en peril / Literature in Peril. Paris: Flammarion, 2007. Print.

Tucan, Dumitru. Introducere în studiile literare / Introduction to Literary Studies. Iași: Institutul European, 2007. Print.

Tucan, Gabriela. “Cognitive Poetics: Blending Narrative Mental Spaces. Self-Construal and Identity in Short Literary Fiction.” ENTHYMEMA 8 (2013): 38-55.

DISTRIBUIȚI