Acasă Articole RTR Dorin Popescu, Degradarea „filosofiei“ la Constantin Noica. Maladivităţi postmoderne (I)

Dorin Popescu, Degradarea „filosofiei“ la Constantin Noica. Maladivităţi postmoderne (I)

493
Rezumat

Degradation of philosophy at Constantin Noica. Postmodern maladies

The main goal of this critical undertake consists in the promotion of vital concepts which can radically modify how Constantin Noica’s work is perceived at the moment.

For now, even after the publication of few hermeneutical integrated analyses, the critical recovery of Noica’s work is delayed and dull, approaching Noica’s conception/creation exclusively as a philosophical one.

Our critical bet is the following: the inherent meaning of the nicasian work is of a proteinic (maximal) nature, composite and lays priority on the literary creation inferences and only subsequently on the discursive inferences.

Our critical demarche seems atypical – few similar analytical assertions are in an incipient stage (e.g. G. Liiceanu).

We hope that our future researches, based on text analysis (mainly on the “pure philosophical” text of C. Noica), will strongly sustain this critical thesis which seems heretic at the moment and will shed the long awaited interpretation on Noica’s work.

Keywords: Constantin Noica, philosophical discourse, language, degradation, proteinic text, border, literature.

Bibliografie
  • Afloroaei, Ştefan 1997. Cum este posibilă filosofia în estul Europei? (How is the Philosophy Possible in Eastern Europe?), Editura Polirom, Colecţia Plural, Iaşi.
  • Bădiliţă, Cristian 2007. Platonopolis sau împăcarea cu filosofia (Platonopolis or Reconciliation with Philosophy), Editura Universităţii Emanuel, Oradea.
  • Codoban, Aurel 1992. Filosofia ca gen literar (Philosophy as a Literary Genre), Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca.
  • Ducrot, Oswald şi Schaeffer, Jean-Marie 1996. Noul dicţionar enciclopedic al ştiinţelor limbajului (New Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language), Editura Babel, Bucureşti.
  • Eco, Umberto 1996. Limitele interpetării (Limits of Rightness), Editura Pontica, Biblioteca Italiană, Constanţa.
  • Liiceanu, Gabriel 1992. Cearta cu filosofia (Dissenting to Philosophy), cap. Filosofia şi paradigma feminină a auditoriului, Editura Humanitas, Bucureşti.
  • Marga, Andrei 1992. Introducere în metodologia şi argumentarea filosofică (Introduction in the Philosophical Methodology and Argumentation), Editura Dacia, Colecţia Propedeutica, Cluj – Napoca.
  • Marino, Adrian 1973. Dicţionar de idei literare (Dictionary of Literary Ideas), vol. I (A-G), Editura Eminescu, Bucureşti.
  • Marino, Adrian 1987. Hermeneutica ideii de literatură (Hermeneutics of the Idea of Literature), Editura Dacia, Cluj – Napoca.
  • Paleologu, Alexandru 1986. Ipoteze de lucru (Working Hypotheses), cap. Despărţirea de Noica (Farewell from Noica), Editura Eminescu, Bucureşti.
DISTRIBUIȚI