Acasă Articole RTR Daniel Crețu, Proclamarea Regatului României și atitudinea Marilor Puteri

Daniel Crețu, Proclamarea Regatului României și atitudinea Marilor Puteri

479
Rezumat

The proclamimg of the Romanian Kingdom and the atitude of the Great Powers

Romania’s foreign policy after 1877 was characterized by efforts meant to consolidate its independence and to obtain recognition at international level. To ensure the stability and continuity of the dynasty, the Government in Bucharest took into account, first and foremost, the necessity of regulating the succession to the throne. The eventuality of the proclamation of the Kingdom was circulated both in the country and abroad immediately after the consecration of its independence. The issue, being openly addressed by Bismarck, has found prompt and unequivocal support, nevertheless, in Vienna, the idea was not accepted. Austro-Hungary has also delayed for half a year its acceptance with respect tothe Kingdom only to seize concessions in relation to the Danube and to ensure the Romanian side’s promise to join the „Zweibund”. Having the support of Germany, Brătianu and Carol were able to avoid Haymerle’spressures, so that Vienna will be placed in front of the fulfilled fact when, on 14/26thMarch 1881, the Assembly of Deputies and the Senate in Bucharest solemnly proclaimed Romania a Kingdom. By April 1881 all major European Powers had officially recognized the Kingdom of Romania. The ascension to the rank of Kingdom has strengthened the position of the dynasty in the country, it bestowed the stability of the constitutional-monarchical institutions of the state and increased the cohesion of the population around the Throne.

Keywords: succession to the throne, Bismarck, Austro-Hungary, Germany, European Powers

Bibliografie
  • 35 de ani de relaţii italo-române, 1879-1914. Documente diplomatice italiene, Editate de Rudolf Dinu, Ion Bulei / 35 years of Italo-Romanian Relations. Italian Diplomatic Documents, Edited by Rudolf Dinu, Ion Bulei, EdituraUniversEnciclopedic, București, 2001.
  • Biblioteca Naţională a României, Fond Brătianu, Dosar 32 / National Library of Romania. Fund Brătianu, File 32.
  • Căzan Gh. N., Tratatul secret de alianţă între România şi Austro-Ungaria (1883) / The Secret Alliance Treaty between Romania and Austro-Hungary,in “Revista română de studii internaţionale”, București, anul VII (1973).
  • Căzan Gh. N., Rădulescu–Zoner Ș., România şi Tripla Alianţă / Romania and the Triple Alliance,Editura Știinţifică și Enciclopedică, București, 1979.
  • Gane C., P.P. Carp şi locul său în istoria politică a ţării / Carp and his Place in the Political History of the Country, vol. I, Editura Ziarului, București, 1936.
  • Memoriile regelui Carol I. De un martor ocular / Memoirs of King Charles I. By an Eyewitness, vol. I, București, Ed. Machiavelli, 1994.
  • Monitorul Oficial, nr. 60, 15/27 martie 1881; nr. 4, 4/16 aprilie 1881 / The Official Monitor, nr. 60, 15/27 March 1881; nr. 4, 4/16 April 1881.
  • Nicolescu G. D., Parlamentul Român, 1886-1901, partea I / The Romanian Parliament, 1880-1901, Part 1, București, 1903.
  • Pavel Teodor, Mişcarea românilor pentru unitat enaţională şi diplomaţia Puterilor Centrale, vol. I (1878 – 1895) / The Movement of the Romanians for National Unity and the Diplomacy of the Central Powers, EdituraFacla, Timișoara, 1979.
  • Platon Gh., Istoria modernă a României, București / The Modern History of Romania, Ed. DidacticășiPedagogică, 1975.
  • România, Arhivele Naţionale Istorice Centrale, Fond. Casa Regală, dosar 37/1879 / Romania, The Central National Historical Archives, Fund. Royal House, File 37/1879.
  • Românul, an XXV, (1881) / The Romanian, year XXV (1881).
DISTRIBUIȚI