Sunday, October 22, 2017
Acasă Articole RTR Implications for language acquisition theories: a fresh look at the “genie case”

Implications for language acquisition theories: a fresh look at the “genie case”

186
Rezumat

Implications for language acquisition theories: a fresh look at the “genie case”

Language is one of the classic examples of the sensitive periodicity of the brain. What it is known so far is that language has a critical period for learning. Babies and children are geniuses until they turn seven, and then there’s a systematic decline in their ability to acquire languages. One of the most fascinating examples in this regards is the case of
Genie, a young girl who for the first 13 years of her life underwent a degree of social isolation and experiential deprivation not previously reported in contemporary scientific history. A lot of laboratory work was done on this case, and linguists and scientists tries to address head-on hypothesis about language and human mind, however, new studies (2011-2015)
indicate that early speech learning is not only limited by the critical period of the first years of life, but it is also severely limited in the absence of social interaction. Moreover, by the age of 5, prior to formal schooling, studies like Patricia Kuhl’s (2011) show that brain activation in the brain areas related to language and literacy are strongly correlated with the social environment of the child’s family. Therefore, scientifically speaking, more than anything Genie’s case proved that complete lack of social interaction has a devastating impact on human language learning, to the extent that normal language skills are never acquired.
Keywords: language acquisition, Genie Case, neuroplasticity, critical period, social environment

Bibliografie

Bock, P. (2005). The Baby Brain. Infant Science: How do Babies Learn to Talk? Pacific Northwest: The Seattle Times Magazine.
Bruer, J.T. (2008). Building bridges in neuroeducation. In A.M. Battro, K.W. Fischer & P.J. Lena, The Educated brain: Essays in NeuroEducation, New York: Cambridge University Press, 43-58
Centre on the Developing Child at Harvard University. Experiences Build Brain Architecture” and “Serve and Return Interaction Shapes Brain Circuitry, videos, “Three Core Concepts in Early Development. [Video] Retrieved April 03, 2016, from ”http://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/multimedia/videos
Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: a psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “wild child”, Cambridge, Academic Press, 94
Curtiss, S. Genie, (2003) Video Interview. Retrieved May 23, 2016 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvu0MA2CF2A
Friederici, A.D., Ruschemeyer, S.A., Hahne, A., & Fiebach, C.J. (2003). The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 117–177
Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Curtiss, S., Rigler, D., &Rigler, M. (1974). The development of language in Genie: a case of language acquisition beyond the ‘critical period’. Elsevier Inc., 4-7
Itard, J.M.G. (1962). The wild boy of Aveyron. (G. Humphrey & M. Humphrey, Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Johnson, J.S. and Newport, E.L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language, Cognitive Psychology
Knudsen EI, (2004). Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior. J Cogn Neurosci 16, 1412–1425.
Kuhl, P. (2000). A New View of Language Acquisition, paper presented at the National Academy of Sciences colloquium “Auditory Neuroscience: Development, Transduction, and Integration,” held May 19–21, 2000, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center in Irvine, CA. Published by the National Academy of Sciences.
Kuhl, P. (2012). Talk on “Babies’ Language Skills.” Mind, Brain, and Behavior Annual Distinguished Lecture Series, Harvard University
Kuhl, P. K. (2015). Early Language Learning and the Social Brain. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press;
Kuhl, P. (2011). The Linguistic Genius of Babies, video talk on TED.com, a TEDxRainier event. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from www.ted.com/talks/patricia_kuhl_the_linguistic_genius_of_babies.html
Kuhl, P.K. (2004). Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–843.
Kuhl, P.K. (2007). Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Developmental Science 10:1, pp 110– Blackwell Publishing Ltd USA. Language, 1, 81–107.
Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language, Wiley, New York
Newport, E. L., &Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance: I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 127–162
Newport, E.L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning, Cognitive Science 14, 11-28.
Singh, J. A.L. and Zingg, R. M. (1966). Wolf-Children and Feral Man, Archon Books
TLC Documentary, (2003). Genie Wiled. Retrieved April 24, 2016 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjZolHCrC8E
Zhang Y, et al. (2009) Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat StructMolBiol, 847-852
Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P.K., Imada, T., Kotani, M., &Tohkura, Y. (2005). Effects of language experience: neural commitment to language-specific auditory patterns. NeuroImage, 26, 703–720

DISTRIBUIȚI